CHAC MOOL

440-pound sculpture — used as ritual table by Mayans — discovered in Mexico. See it

https://www.yahoo.com/news/440-pound-sculpture-used-ritual-182110886.html

Less than a year after a massive, ancient stone carving was discovered in western Mexico, it is on display for the public for the first time, officials said.

It is uncommon to find these kinds of artifacts in western Mexico, archaeologists said, which raises questions as to why it was there.

The image of a seated person is classic for a chacmool, a ritualistic table that was used in pre-Hispanic times, according to the release. Archaeologists believe it was used in sacrificial and offering ceremonies.

Researchers are not sure of the origin of chacmools, and few have been found in the archaeological record, the researchers said.

Only 70 pieces have ever been found, and one hasn’t been found in this region of Mexico since 1938, archaeologists said.

Since the piece has been well-preserved, the researchers hope it will shed light on how the sculptures were used and how the art form was created centuries ago.

*

I have been in Chichen Itza and I have been sitting over Chac Mool statue. Archaeologist don't know what chacmools are like you can read from news above. I am suggesting that  Chac Mool was deity/evil entity/supernatural being which Aztecs made sacrifices. It was my job to clear Chichen Itza's statue and I done it.  First it felt like some kind of evil energy started entering from my foots and continue to rise over through my body to the neck. I stopped the energy and clear it and it was quite easy because I am Lightworker/Light Warrior. There is an image in this posting's start and there is someone sitting in Chac Mool, I am not in picture and maybe someone else too has tried to clear the statue. Some mexicans whom I told about sitting in chacmool was horrified and respected what I have done.

Usually some archaeologist condemns straight away all the new ideas like they have done for example to Graham Hancock and Robert Bauwal and is calling they work pseudoarcheology. See wikipedia article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Hancock

Hancock's claims and methods are regarded as pseudoarchaeology. Jeb Card has suggested that attempts to critique Hancock's work "using the criteria of professional archaeology is doomed to failure, as his goals are outside the goals of the materialist practice of scientific archaeology." descrbing the goals of Hancock as mythic and paranormal in nature.[29] Archaeologist John Hoopes has described Hancock's claims as effectively religious in nature and rooted in New Age beliefs. In Archaeological Fantasies Garrett G. Fagan points out that pseudoarchaeologists cherry pick evidence and misrepresent known facts. When apparently factual claims in their works are investigated it turns out that "quotes are presented out of context, critical countervailing data is withheld, the state of understanding is misrepresented, or critical archaeological information about context is ignored".

However there are people who are doing psychic and intuitive archaeology.

Few years ago there was also William Gadoury case, a 15 year old boy who find ancient Mayan city. See link:

https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-36259047

Some archaeologist judge the theory right away and not even see Williams work, only read news about it and they was claiming that the square what is in satellite images is cornfield (=milpa) or active cannabis field, I don't like it when someone else's enthusiasm and passion is knocked out at the same time and even done this for a 15 year old boy. Let all flowers bloom.